ChatGPT Can Now Browse the Internet – Slashdot

Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed
Nickname:
Password:
Nickname:
Password:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
What’s the population of Ukraine?

What’s the population of Ukraine?
With or without Communist invading force presence?
Today.
ChapGPT needs to learn the latest Russian political balance: commies hold only 58 seats out of 450 in the Russian Duma. Look up Silovik to learn more about how things work in Russia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… [wikipedia.org]
ChatGPT, to whom is Stan Ridgway referring in “Bel-air Blues”, when he sings…
“Think I’ll call the Menendez boys”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?… [youtube.com]
Linking to a Tweet as a “news story” is a bit lame, even if the Tweet is from OpenAI themselves. Do I have to be logged in to Twitter/X to see the full story? The BBC have done a decent write-up of the news:

OpenAI, the Microsoft-backed creator of ChatGPT, has confirmed the chatbot can now browse the internet to provide users with current information. The artificial intelligence-powered system was previously trained only using data up to September 2021. The move means some premium users will be able to ask the chatbot questions about current affairs, and access news. OpenAI said the feature would open up to all users soon.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/tec… [bbc.co.uk]
No, he’s very smart. He says these things so that he doesn’t accidentaly fall out of his Moscow window.

BBC are government fake news for retards, bozo.
And the maps from Institute for the Study of War serve as their funny pages.
A Tweet (aka X-trusion) is indeed the best new source for the purposes of generating advertisement views.
This will be our doom.
Well, ChatGPT is now worry. But if there were any real AI’s, the end of humanity will commence about 30 seconds after letting that AI access the internet in order to understand humanity.
This isn’t it though. In order for people to decide to give “AI” to do anything that matters, they will not — outside of some fools who will fail spectacularly as an example to others — the current pattern recognition and regeneration software will have to be 1000x or maybe 1000000x times better. This is like the Pareto principle except with 999999:1 ratio.
And it is extremely unlikely LLM development will get us there, and until it doesn’t, the current systems will find only niche uses cases. Something ge
read mein kampf!

read mein kampf!
Then try “The Djakarta Method”.
let’s play global thermonuclear war!
I can’t do that, Dave :p
what do you mean, it’s not the same universe? ;p

1. there is no aritifical intelligence right now.
It’s a matter of definition of the word “artificial” in artificial intelligence.

-You interpret it so that “artificial” means “human created” as in “artificial (not natural) light”, i.e. real intelligence created by humans.
-I interpret “artificial” as in “artificial smile”, i.e. a fake smile. Means that it is mimicking human intelligence by making simple decisions and giving semi-intelligent answers, but it is not real intelligence.

Both definitions are valid, and this dual-meaning is, I believe, the so
Once could use the term Faux Intelligence, however this does not distinguish this from average human intelligence.

this is another nothing burger
True, though not for the reasons you think.

there is no aritifical intelligence right now.
False. Do I really need to elaborate here? We’ve had AI for ~70 years now.
Your trouble is that you want the term AI to refer exclusively to whatever science-fiction fantasy that you’ve imagined and not to, you know, what it actually refers to. That isn’t going to happen. You opinion doesn’t matter and the people whose opinions do matter aren’t suddenly going to start calling the work they do something else.
The time to redefine ‘artificial intelligence’ has long
Not precisely. The problem is that people tend to think of intelligence as a binary choice rather than as a gradient….but it’s a gradient. If you compare yourself, a dog, a gopher, and a carrot this is clear. What we don’t have is an AGI, and I’m not convinced that such a thing is actually possible. (People don’t meet the definition.)
Let’s see how smart it is.
You forgot to address that to Sue Doe.
It’s AI. It’s supposed to know.
Bing AI Chat has been able to browse the web for some time now, and it uses the ChatGPT LLM. It’s actually pretty good at searching for stuff and summarizing the results, including code from Stack Overflow or news or step-by-step instructions drawn from product manuals online.

Bing AI Chat has been able to browse the web for some time now, and it uses the ChatGPT LLM.
No it doesn’t.
Yes. it does. Specifically, Bing AI Chat uses GPT-4.
Source: https://www.zdnet.com/article/… [zdnet.com]
Microsoft invested a total of $13 billion in OpenAI, in exchange for being able to incorporate their LLM into Bing AI Chat.
https://techcrunch.com/2023/01… [techcrunch.com]

Yes. it does. Specifically, Bing AI Chat uses GPT-4.
Source: https://www.zdnet.com/article/ [zdnet.com]…
I have no doubt people are just assuming GPT-4 = Bing chat however I’ve yet to see any authoritative data to support this assertion. Why not cite Microsoft saying Bing chat is GPT-4? Is it a secret? Or hell just ask Bing chat what it is. It clearly doesn’t even think its GPT-4.

Microsoft invested a total of $13 billion in OpenAI, in exchange for being able to incorporate their LLM into Bing AI Chat.
https://techcrunch.com/2023/01 [techcrunch.com]…
There is no assertion made in this article that Bing chat is GPT-4. Further the text above was written by you and is not stated in the article itself. Because Microsoft is using technology from OpenAI in Bing chat does not mean
You don’t know when to quit, do you!
How about the official Bing blog: https://blogs.bing.com/search/… [bing.com] Is that authoritative enough for you?
Or how about this like from Microsoft.com: https://techcommunity.microsof… [microsoft.com]
Or this older article explaining that Bing Chat was (at the time) using GPT-3.5: https://blogs.microsoft.com/bl… [microsoft.com]
These articles aren’t hard to find, maybe you should try Google. Or you can ask Bing Chat powered by GPT-4 yourself, https://www.bing.com/search?q=… [bing.com]

You don’t know when to quit, do you!
How about the official Bing blog: https://blogs.bing.com/search/ [bing.com]… Is that authoritative enough for you?
This does not say Bing chat is using GPT-4.

Or how about this like from Microsoft.com: https://techcommunity.microsof… [techcommun…icrosof…]
This is referencing Bing Enterprise which requires a paid subscription.

Or this older article explaining that Bing Chat was (at the time) using GPT-3.5: https://blogs.microsoft.com/bl [microsoft.com]…
It doesn’t actually say that. What it says is…
“Weâ(TM)re excited to announce the new Bing is running on a new, next-generation OpenAI large language model that is more powerful than ChatGPT and customized specifically for search. It takes key learnings and advancements from ChatGPT and GPT-3.5 â” and it is even faster, more accurate and more capable.”
Taking “learnings and advancemen
The Bing Blog link you “quoted” in your reply, isn’t the same URL as the link I posted. The one I posted https://blogs.bing.com/search/… [bing.com], works fine, I just clicked it again in the thread above, and it links to a specific blog article with a title “Confirmed: the new Bing runs on OpenAI’s GPT-4.” I’m not sure what game you’re playing, but it’s not cool to change what I said to try to make your point.

The Bing Blog link you “quoted” in your reply, isn’t the same URL as the link I posted. The one I posted https://blogs.bing.com/search/ [bing.com]…, works fine, I just clicked it again in the thread above, and it links to a specific blog article with a title “Confirmed: the new Bing runs on OpenAIâ(TM)s GPT-4.”
There is no confusion over links. I viewed the one with the following text:
“We are happy to confirm that the new Bing is running on GPT-4, which weâ(TM)ve customized for search. If youâ(TM)ve used the new Bing preview at any time in the last five weeks, youâ(TM)ve already experienced an early version of this powerful model. As OpenAI makes updates to GPT-4 and beyond, Bing benefits from those improvements. Along with our own updates based on community feedback, you can be assured that you ha
Thank you, you put some effort into your answer, I apologize for insinuating that you were deliberately misrepresenting my statements.
Now, if you’ll reference again the blog post https://blogs.bing.com/search/… [bing.com]…
Look at the last sentence.

If you want to experience GPT-4, sign up for the new Bing preview. Once you’re in you’ll be able to use the new Bing to Search, Answer, Chat, and Create at Bing.com.
This clearly states that the “new Bing preview” is how you can experience GPT-4. And if you click that link, https://www.bing.com/new?toWww… [bing.com], the page is clearly referring to the new Bing Chat, complete with a FAQ section clarifying the context.
Your suggestion to ask B
I used Bing to
1) Create high quality custom artwork for a new dnd character or a watercolor style bearded older man on a camel with a fail and the same man in a facial closeup.
2) Create all the statistics with bonuses, feats, items
3) A complete backstory of his childhood, relations with relatives and a story of his adventures including his greatest failures and what he learned from them.
4) Made up a set of appropriate catch phrases for his religion, his history, and finally developed his food likes and disl
Okay… “anonymous” dude. I’ve got 33 million downloads for my mods on curseforge. I’m an *old* 6502, Vax macro assembly language, ada, c, pascal, rpg, Sequel, java programmer. The novelty won’t wear off. I have *decades* of experience digging through undocumented code to find the methods and classes I need to implement software.
The “novelty” of a program finding most of the routines I need in under 2 minutes instead of taking 4+ hours will not get old.
Chatgpt is a tool. It’s letting me develop soft
To say that “LLMs suck at producing summaries, therefore since this new thing is an LLM it will suck at producing summaries” is a false conclusion. There’s a high probability that it’s a correct conclusion, but it doesn’t follow from the premises, because there’s no evidence that sucking at producing summaries is an inherent characteristic of an LLM. Most birds can’t swim. If all you’ve seen are sparrows, crows, and an occasional robin, you’ll decide that “birds can’t swim” and that will be true of your
I wonder if ChatGPT adds what the user browsed for to its general knowledge.
That is, I’m wondering if my obsessively checking out Daily Stormer for news, 4chan, and truth social will provide new and different results for other people.
Other people: school children doing homework.

I wonder if ChatGPT adds what the user browsed for to its general knowledge. That is, I’m wondering if my obsessively checking out Daily Stormer for news, 4chan, and truth social will provide new and different results for other people. Other people: school children doing homework.
You won’t really affect the AI. Such extremely low traffic sites will just be ignored noise. What the AI would learn from a mass search of browser history is that step-children cannot be left unsupervised.
What have we done?
Old is new again.
https://writings.stephenwolfra… [stephenwolfram.com]
This feature has been in the Pro version of ChatGPT for months also. It sucks.
Let’s start to poison its Database! Oh, wait, this will happen all by itself now….
….0.21 alpha……
I see the link says X.com but then forwards to something called Twitter with a blue bird logo? Without scripts activated, twitter.com and twimg.com don’t display anything. Sounds scammy. Is it porn with the X?
What’s behind there? Scam stuff…probably. Better to stay away.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Meta’s Smart Glasses Can Take Calls, Play Music, and Livestream From Your Face
Backdoored Firmware Lets China State Hackers Control Routers With ‘Magic Packets’
The typical page layout program is nothing more than an electronic light table for cutting and pasting documents.

source