US Chip Curbs Give Huawei a Chance To Fill the Nvidia Void In China – Slashdot
Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I see lots of articles saying that the US is worried about China (and by extention the Chinese military) having access to advanced AI. What I can’t find is any information on exactly what the Chinese could do with said AI that is so concerning to the US. What exactly is the US so worried about China doing with these advanced AI chips?
In military matters, there is the concept of detente -maintaining a balance of power… or if you can’t keep a balance of power, making sure that your side is the one with more power.
The idea comes down to not letting the Chinese military make technological advances faster than the US military.
To quote Dr Strangelove “we cannot allow a mine-shaft gap!” (watch the movie -its worth it)
As long as the powers remain in balance, neither believes it can “win” a war -so neither starts one.
We cannot allow a mine-shaft gap!
We cannot allow a mine-shaft gap!
Every military wants technological superiority. Detente happens because the cost of winning or even continuing the pissing-contest is too high: Reagan maintained nuclear detente while starting a technology pissing-contest, which Russia lost.
Some generals define ‘winning’ as suffering fewer casualities: Thus North Korea lost, Cuba lost and Vietnam lost, while the U.S. didn’t acheive any of their anti-communism/pro-merchantilism objectives. Worse, years of oppression allowed equally oppressive militas to
As long as the powers remain in balance, neither believes it can “win” a war -so neither starts one.
As long as the powers remain in balance, neither believes it can “win” a war -so neither starts one.
Balance is not needed. It’s sufficient for both sides to maintain counter-value strike capability. As long as neither side believes they have perfected anti-ballistic missiles, then any attack would cost more than one could gain from it, and no major war will occur. Of course they could be mistaken about their own capabilities, which is why ABMs are destabilizing. If nuclear missiles cannot maintain MAD, then countries might turn towards other kinds of weapons that could, such as space-based weapons or biol
Probably propaganda and fake social media post concerns too. A moderately decent AI can produce fake posts at an alarming rate, and bypass things like captchas to create new accounts, faster than humans can.
They’re going to use them to do photorealistic renders of the J20-C to make it look like they’ve got a fleet of them ready to take on the US.
If Russia can get enough washing machines together we may get to see a wing of SU-57’s in action as well.
funny you’d say that…
Russia’s GDP going up pretty good https://tradingeconomics.com/r… [tradingeconomics.com] while the US is heading into a recession…
the one thing the US is not going to ever be short of is hubris…
Ahmed said. “To get something that’s in the ballpark, it is 5 or 10 years,” he added.
Ahmed said. “To get something that’s in the ballpark, it is 5 or 10 years,” he added.
Which means China will do it in a year or so.
That people think US can sanction export of a tech and yet Chinese companies are supposed to respect US patents on the same tech and not develop their own versions. Rule of law only works if everyone is on the same playing field. China will simply derecognize patents of US companies complying with export bans. Patents have validity only if recognized by the sovereign which in the case of China is not the US govt.
That people think US can sanction export of a tech and yet Chinese companies are supposed to respect US patents on the same tech and not develop their own versions. Rule of law only works if everyone is on the same playing field. China will simply derecognize patents of US companies complying with export bans. Patents have validity only if recognized by the sovereign which in the case of China is not the US govt.
There was something similar a year or two ago and the legal situation (the WTO rules) was reported to be as you say – if they can’t buy it then they are permitted to make it.
That people think US can sanction export of a tech and yet Chinese companies are supposed to respect US patents on the same tech and not develop their own versions. Rule of law only works if everyone is on the same playing field. China will simply derecognize patents of US companies complying with export bans. Patents have validity only if recognized by the sovereign which in the case of China is not the US govt.
That people think US can sanction export of a tech and yet Chinese companies are supposed to respect US patents on the same tech and not develop their own versions. Rule of law only works if everyone is on the same playing field. China will simply derecognize patents of US companies complying with export bans. Patents have validity only if recognized by the sovereign which in the case of China is not the US govt.
What is really staggeringly puzzling is the fact that some people can’t or won’t realize that China society (both the government and business) will never respect any IP or patent rights of any US technology and will continually steal it for the advantage of the Chinese. The US government is finally realizing this and is reacting. Whether or not that reaction is appropriate is but for debate. But the fundamental dynamic of the relationship is not debatable. The Rule of Law only works if both societies are pl
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Thousands of Remote IT Workers Sent Wages To North Korea To Help Fund Weapons Program, Says FBI
OpenBSD 7.4 Released
A method of solution is perfect if we can forsee from the start, and even prove, that following that method we shall attain our aim. — Leibnitz
