Fusus' AI-Powered Cameras Are Spreading Across the United States – Slashdot
Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Would need to be very careful with a pet database. Pet theft is a thing, and dog owners would likely reveal a lot of information about themselves from the route they take for walkies.
My advice is wait for Google’s version of AirTags, and then attach one of those to your pet’s collar.
No matter which one I click on, I see a 404.
Indeed, you should see a 403 if privacy was respected.
lol, yea, lets make the site looks like a 404 page and hide the content below the ad, yea that’ll be cool
The government has a secret system, a machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it. I designed the machine to detect acts of terror but it sees everything. Violent crimes involving ordinary people, people like you…..
Amazing how this crowd relentlessly succeeds to keep politics even geopolitics out of tech discussions, on top doesn’t ever try to polarize. This is how America will be great again!
While you are at least mostly correct, the issue isn’t directly politics, it is who watches the watchers. In the end, only allegiance to Big Brother(aka Deep State) will be tolerated. Political Opinions will decide which authoritarian faction will win.
See Conspiracy Theory(movie) and its “They vs Them” explanation.
No, “Grimm” was in Portland – “Person of Interest” was in NYC…
“Person of Interest” was mostly great.
“Look at the buzzword while we roll out a mass surveillance system to surpass the Stasi you stupid bastards. Talk endlessly about the buzzword. Talk about how much you love the buzzword, how you hate the buzzword, how overrated the buzzword is. Just continue to ignore what’s happening that isn’t the buzzword peons.”
I rather suspect that due to various TOS it’s not stealing. People may not know that they’ve agreed to this, but they probably have.
The problem we have to wrestle with is what it means to be in “public”. Because that is always the retort. You are in public, thus you have no expectation of privacy.
But when people formulated that notion, there was never any expectation that there would be intelligent, omnipresent, super-human presence everyone, recording and examining everything we do, storing and linking that data and examining it a million different ways. And that “forever” data is just waiting to be weaponized by any number of bad p
Just consider the implications of the phrase “Thou, O God, seest me.”. This concept dates back to at least the middle ages.
>”Just consider the implications of the phrase “Thou, O God, seest me.”. This concept dates back to at least the middle ages.”
But, in that context, “God” is all-seeing, and all-goodness. One that will, presumably, judge you at the end.
In THIS article/thread context, we are talking about people with that power- in all their corruption, pettiness, vindictiveness, and wickedness.
All you have to do is imagine your worst enemies or those with the worst motives having immediate and almost unlimited access to
God was “all good” only in the sense that the faerie were “the good folk”.
FUSUS has partnered with our local PD, and has a website where you can register your cameras. In this case you’re just telling the police that cameras are installed at your address, so that they can reach out to you to request footage in case of a crime.
The FUSUS boxes are pricey, and I doubt many residential homeowners would bother to install them. According to the officer I spoke with, it is mainly business owners in downtown and commercial areas who are buying them. There’s a lot of late-night smash-a
>”FUSUS has partnered with our local PD, and has a website where you can register your cameras. In this case you’re just telling the police that cameras are installed at your address, so that they can reach out to you to request footage in case of a crime.”
That concept I have no problem with. Voluntary enrollment, and requests for footage as long as it requires permission and positive action each time on the owner of the camera system, including an explanation as to what they are looking for/why. You c
Generally I appreciate the work the EFF does however I am increasingly finding their responses to the evolution of surveillance technology to be lacking. Their website is full of references to community-based workshops and toolkits and the like. They promote ‘conversations’ on privacy with community leaders, etc etc and have “victories”: in 18 ‘disparate’ communities like San Francisco, Oakland, Santa Clara…all with a tilt towards abstinence of video surveillance.
What I think would be useful to society
Reading through the linked article, I get the strong impression that “AI-powered cameras” is clickbait hyperbole. There’s zero “AI” in those cameras or anywhere near them.
What probably does happen is that you buy their devices which “can range between $350 and $7,300”. A technician comes out and plugs in whatever wiring is necessary to get the video feed from your cameras going to their box, which sends those feeds over the internet to servers in the cloud. If the box can use your internet its cheaper. If t
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Researchers Revolt Against Weekend Conferences
FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Found Guilty of Fraud
According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless.
