Google Nears Release of Conversational AI Software 'Gemini' – Slashdot

Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop




The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

For Google, the stakes of Gemini’s launch are high.

For Google, the stakes of Gemini’s launch are high.
The hype is high, the stakes are not high.
The stakes certainly are high for Google. This is the first time anyone has posed a real threat to Google’s search dominance.

It’s not likely to be a problem until chatbots can solve their hallucination problem.

It’s not likely to be a problem until chatbots can solve their hallucination problem.
The hallucinations will be solved with faster hardware, deeper networks, more data, and better algorithms. That will likely happen much sooner than most people expect.
Faster hardware and deeper networks will happen with the new 3nm tensor processors due early next year. More data is already available. Better algorithms will include more adversarial feedback and boosting [wikipedia.org].
When you look at a current LLM, you’re looking at an infant or maybe a toddler. They will grow up fast.

When you look at a current LLM, you’re looking at an infant or maybe a toddler.

When you look at a current LLM, you’re looking at an infant or maybe a toddler.
No toddler has read 8 billion books or websites. You can’t compare them like that.

No toddler has read 8 billion books or websites. You can’t compare them like that.

No toddler has read 8 billion books or websites. You can’t compare them like that.
Indeed. Also, LLMs don’t wear diapers.
But that’s okay because the comparison was a metaphor. I wasn’t saying that an LLM is literally a small child not yet potty-trained.
Ok, I’ll bite – Who is posing a real threat to Google’s search dominance?

Ok, I’ll bite – Who is posing a real threat to Google’s search dominance?

Ok, I’ll bite – Who is posing a real threat to Google’s search dominance?
Microsoft in partnership with OpenAI.
Google still dominates, but unless they improve quickly, that could change.
Microsoft is trying yet again to introduce an assistant into Windows. Having just murdered Cortana, the now have a ChatGPT one in preview builds of Windows 11. From what I’ve seen it’s deeply unimpressive, and would doubtless become one of those things you immediately disable after installation completes, but still… It’s there and Google seems to be worried.
I’ve been testing out Google’s Bard AI. It’s okay… Sometimes the answers it gives are quite good, but almost always excessively long. You can ask fo
Sorry, I didn’t realize this wasn’t clear. ChatGPT, of course. And Bing Chat, which is based on ChatGPT.

For Google, the stakes of Gemini’s launch are high.

The hype is high, the stakes are not high.

For Google, the stakes of Gemini’s launch are high.

For Google, the stakes of Gemini’s launch are high.
The hype is high, the stakes are not high.
No, I think that the stakes for Google are higher than, say, Microsoft making Bob Clippy Cortana Copilot successful, because the standard is different for Google.
OpenAI pulled from whatever-they-could. There are questions about exactly *what* they pulled from and the nature of those sources, but ChatGPT seems to be proving at least somewhat-useful to some people.
Google has been well known to be scraping an absurd amount of data for decades. They have trillions of e-mails, contacts, calendars, documents, and

Can’t Google just … have one product focus at a time? At one point they had Hangouts, Google Chat, Google Meet, Duo, Messages, Voice… Now we’ve got Bard, Gemini…how many weeks until we have 3 or 4 more “AI” properties that do exactly the same thing…

Can’t Google just … have one product focus at a time? At one point they had Hangouts, Google Chat, Google Meet, Duo, Messages, Voice… Now we’ve got Bard, Gemini…how many weeks until we have 3 or 4 more “AI” properties that do exactly the same thing…
I think Google is taking the “systemd” approach to products – keep throwing stuff out there until something shows enough “staying power” and then sort of maintain it.
Personally I would prefer Google take a more UNIX approach to products – get a product stablized, developed, showing some following, then maintain the heck out of it, even if it means working on fewer products at the same time.
Did they not know that Gemini is already the name of a popular cryptocurrency trading exchange? Is there an office of registering names to avoid conflicts like this? Did they bother doing a quick Google search, or was it intentional?

Did they not know that Gemini is already the name of a popular cryptocurrency trading exchange?

Did they not know that Gemini is already the name of a popular cryptocurrency trading exchange?
There are dozens of companies and products that use “Gemini”.

Is there an office of registering names to avoid conflicts like this?

Is there an office of registering names to avoid conflicts like this?
It’s not a conflict because they are two different businesses and don’t compete.
When registering a trademark, you only register it for a specific business, product, or service.
Somehow, I do not think so. By the time Google has something halfway usable, the AI hype will be over.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
California Legislature Passes Delete Act Regulating Data Brokers
iPhone 15 Models Have ‘Completely Standard’ USB-C Port
I put up my thumb… and it blotted out the planet Earth. — Neil Armstrong

source

Jesse
https://playwithchatgtp.com